After watching the video in class regarding piracy in our music industry, I agree that it is wrong for music artists to use copyrighted material for their own profit schemes. On the other hand, if one’s usage of copyrighted material does not garner them any monetary benefits, what’s the big deal? Lawrence Lessig discusses these issues and how ideas about piracy have changed over the years. Lessig notes that piracy has now gone past the physical stealing of copyrighted material. While this is an important issue in and of itself, piracy taking place through other avenues besides physical stores that sell copyrighted material that one physically grabs is left up for debate. Of course the recording labels and the movie industry advertise against this “new age” piracy, while others do not find a problem with it. The MPAA has an advertisement on many DVDs that explains “you wouldn’t steal a car, you wouldn’t steal a handbag, you wouldn’t steal a movie”, so why isn’t it ok to download copyrighted material? They say “downloading pirated films is stealing.”
Even Jack Black, a famous actor, pleads for piracy to stop.
But will it stop?
Lessig argues that international piracy could provide benefits for American companies. He argues that Chinese consumers who steal Mircosoft’s Windows program will eventually have the means to buy the program later on as China’s wealth improves. Although this could happen, most companies or rightful owners of copyrighted material are not worth billions of dollars like Mircosoft and cannot afford for piracy like this to take place. Lessig also contends that piracy does have its place in society. He writes, “…even if some piracy is plainly wrong, not all ‘piracy’ is. Or at least, not all ‘piracy’ is wrong if that term is understood in the way it is increasingly used today. Many kinds of ‘piracy’ are useful and productive, to produce either new content or new ways of doing business. Neither our tradition nor any tradition has ever banned all ‘piracy’ in that sense of the term.” The remix artist Girl Talk is a great example of this accepted piracy. Girl Talk has became famous for his mash-up style of music. His songs rely solely on copyrighted music samples. Never once has he gotten permission from any of the artists’ samples used in his remixes. He posts his remixes online free of charge on his illegal art record label website.
However, Girl Talk has concerts all across the country for which he is paid for using these samples. Girl Talk even had a concert here at Lawrence University in May of 2009 for which he was compensated for.
While I agree with the argument presented and also feel it to be immoral to profit off copyright infringement there have been numerous instances of copyrights helping protect artists (as well as corporate dollars). For instance, in the film, Clyde Stubblefield (James Brown's drummer) states that he wishes to receive credit for his samples used by artists. It is worth noting that he doesn't ask for royalties, simply for his name to be listed under samples used. Copyright protection laws are in place to protect corporate dollars as well as artistic integrity. Once again, great job imbedding videos and use of examples.
ReplyDeleteYeah I agree with both you and Marc, I think that its wrong to profit off of others work (unless permission is given). I think that if people give credit where needed, then it should be okay. Because there are so many creative things that people create based off of or using parts of other people's work and it would be a shame to not see those things again because of copyright. I also like the videos you Incorporated, good job!
ReplyDeleteI think everyone (besides those committing the act) can agree that piracy is stealing and should therefore be stopped. However, 'sampling' as hip hop artists and DJ's like to call it, remains borderline for me. The video we watched in class both answered and raised a lot of questions for me. I would like to look further into 'sampling' and really get down to why some artists don't mind if their music is used as a baseline and some really do. With that said, I definitely feel that at least putting the person's name in the album is necessary and should be enforced.
ReplyDelete